Solo Sisters

Solo Sisters

A community-generated toolkit to foster connection, and support an international Sisterhood of solo female travelers.
A community-generated toolkit to foster connection, and support an international Sisterhood of solo female travelers.

Role

Role

Product Design
UX Research
Visual Design
Prototyping

Product Design
UX Research
Visual Design
Prototyping

company

company

Nomadic Matt

Nomadic Matt

Stakeholder

Stakeholder

Director of Community

Director of Community

Recognition

🏆

London Design Awards: UX Design - Travel & Culture

🏆

UX Design Awards Nominee

🏆

Interaction Awards Nominee

Recognition

🏆

London Design Awards: UX Design - Travel & Culture

🏆

UX Design Awards Nominee

🏆

Interaction Awards Nominee

PROJECT SUMMARY

PROJECT SUMMARY

Context

Context

Solo female travel is booming, with a 761.15% increase in popularity since 2021. Yet the tools and resources in market haven’t kept pace. With a goal of creating a more progressive and equitable travel industry, I explored how to better support solo female travelers without compromising the magic of traveling alone.

Solo female travel is booming, but resources in the market space still do not reflect that. Working to create a more progressive and equitable travel industry, I explored how to connect and serve the vulnerable community of solo female travelers while still maintaining the magic of their experiences.

Watch my 6 minute presentation here!

Watch my 6 minute presentation here!

The Problem

The Problem

Beginner solo female travelers often lack confidence in their ability to take and enjoy a trip alone. They list concerns of safety, navigation, and social isolation as what’s holding them back.

Beginner solo female travelers often lack confidence in their ability to take and enjoy a trip alone. They list concerns of safety, navigation, and social isolation as what’s holding them back.

Role

Product Design
UX Research
Visual Design
Prototyping

company

Nomadic Matt

Stakeholder

Director of Community

Recognition

🏆

London Design Awards: UX Design - Travel & Culture

🏆

UX Design Awards Nominee

🏆

Interaction Awards Nominee

With women traveling alone more than ever...

With women traveling alone more than ever...

How might we help bolster solo female travelers' confidence by providing safety measures when alone in a new region?

How might we help bolster solo female travelers' confidence by providing safety measures when alone in a new region?

The Solution

The Solution

A Community-Generate Toolkit & Connection App

A Community-Generate Toolkit & Connection App

A Community-Generate Toolkit & Connection App

Solo Sisters is centered on intersectional feminism, made for anyone who identifies as a woman, and provides the resources and knowledge to navigate the nuances of adventuring on your own. The platform is an international Sisterhood of solo female travelers, whether they’re out exploring the world or back at home.

Solo Sisters is centered on intersectional feminism, made for anyone who identifies as a woman, and provides the resources and knowledge to navigate the nuances of adventuring on your own. The platform is an international Sisterhood of solo female travelers, whether they’re out exploring the world or back at home.

problem addressed

Safety | Uncertainty

Insight

Solo female travelers actively research safety, logistics, and cultural norms, but struggle to find trustworthy, destination-specific guidance in one place—leading to uncertainty and decision fatigue.

Solo female travelers actively research safety, logistics, and cultural norms, but struggle to find trustworthy, destination-specific guidance in one place—leading to uncertainty and decision fatigue.

solution

Make well-informed decisions with location-specific Travel Tips

Make well-informed decisions with location-specific Travel Tips

problem addressed

Safety

Insight

Solo female travelers feel more confident visiting places that have been vetted by people like them, and value recommendations rooted in lived experience.

Solo female travelers feel more confident visiting places that have been vetted by people like them, and value recommendations rooted in lived experience.

solution

Find comfort in shared community

Find comfort in shared community

problem addressed

Isolation

Insight

Solo female travelers are intentional and goal-oriented, seeking connection that aligns with their travel style, values, and intentions

Solo female travelers are intentional and goal-oriented, seeking connection that aligns with their travel style, values, and intentions

solution

Meet travelers nearby & see if it's a compatible match

Meet travelers nearby & see if it's a compatible match

problem addressed

Uncertainty | Isolation

Insight

Locals hold invaluable cultural knowledge and often want to share it, while travelers crave authentic, human insight that goes beyond traditional tourist recommendations.

Locals hold invaluable cultural knowledge and often want to share it, while travelers crave authentic, human insight that goes beyond traditional tourist recommendations.

solution

Engage with locals

Engage with locals

The approach

The approach

Design Process

Design Process

Using a double-diamond design process, I explored two distinct problem spaces through sequential experiments, refining each and ultimately converging them into a single, integrated experience.

Using a double-diamond design process, I explored two distinct problem spaces through sequential experiments, refining each and ultimately converging them into a single, integrated experience.

Experiment #1
Experiment #1

Solving for Social Isolation

Solving for Social Isolation

Experiment #2
Experiment #2

Solving for Safety

Solving for Safety

+

Combine Experiments #1+2
Combine Experiments #1+2

Solving for Social Isolation & Safety

Solving for Social Isolation & Safety

Discovery

Discovery

The Opportunity

The Opportunity

Solo female travel is booming, but most travel tools weren’t designed with the nuances of traveling alone as a woman in mind.

Solo female travel is booming, but most travel tools weren’t designed with the nuances of traveling alone as a woman in mind.

Interviewing Diverse Groups of Women

Interviewing Diverse Groups of Women

Over the first few months of research, I interviewed 16 women–10 women who have traveler solo before, and 6 women who have never traveled solo before.

Over the first few months of research, I interviewed 16 women–10 women who have traveler solo before, and 6 women who have never traveled solo before.

What We Learned from Conversations with Women

What We Learned from Conversations with Women
Conversations with women revealed that many first-time solo travelers feel uncertain about their ability to travel alone. This uncertainty was driven by three recurring concerns:
Conversations with women revealed that many first-time solo travelers feel uncertain about their ability to travel alone. This uncertainty was driven by three recurring concerns:
While these themes were consistent, their meaning and intensity varied from woman to woman.

This insight made it clear that a single, prescriptive solution would fall short—flexibility and self-definition needed to be central to the experience.

While these themes were consistent, their meaning and intensity varied from woman to woman.

This insight made it clear that a single, prescriptive solution would fall short—flexibility and self-definition needed to be central to the experience.

Understanding the Competitive Landscape

Understanding the Competitive Landscape

Research showed that solo female travelers were piecing together a fragmented mix of travel, safety, and social tools. To understand what was—and wasn’t—working, I evaluated adjacent products through the lens of three core problem areas: social isolation, safety, and uncertainty.

Research showed that solo female travelers were piecing together a fragmented mix of travel, safety, and social tools. To understand what was—and wasn’t—working, I evaluated adjacent products through the lens of three core problem areas: social isolation, safety, and uncertainty.

Research showed that solo female travelers were piecing together a fragmented mix of travel, safety, and social tools. To understand what was—and wasn’t—working, I evaluated adjacent products through the lens of three core problem areas: social isolation, safety, and uncertainty.

This evaluation revealed a clear gap: most products addressed only one dimension of the solo travel experience. No solution meaningfully integrated social isolation, safety, and uncertainty.
This evaluation revealed a clear gap: most products addressed only one dimension of the solo travel experience. No solution meaningfully integrated social isolation, safety, and uncertainty.

Mapping Assumptions with Stakeholders to Prioritize What to Solve

Mapping Assumptions with Stakeholders to Prioritize What to Solve

With the three core problem spaces—social isolation, safety, and uncertainty—defined, I worked with other designers on the project to map our assumptions. This included surfacing my own biases shaped by personal travel experience and examining where intuition, rather than evidence, was influencing early thinking.

With the three core problem spaces—social isolation, safety, and uncertainty—defined, I worked with other designers on the project to map our assumptions. This included surfacing my own biases shaped by personal travel experience and examining where intuition, rather than evidence, was influencing early thinking.

By plotting my assumptions based on certainty (known vs. unknown) and user impact (low vs. high value), II identified which beliefs posed the greatest risk if left untested. This helped prioritize high-impact unknowns and ensured early research focused on the problems most critical to solve.

By plotting my assumptions based on certainty (known vs. unknown) and user impact (low vs. high value), II identified which beliefs posed the greatest risk if left untested. This helped prioritize high-impact unknowns and ensured early research focused on the problems most critical to solve.

Persona Spectrum

Persona Spectrum

Based on insights from 16 user interviews, patterns emerged around how women experience solo travel—not as fixed personas, but along a spectrum of confidence, preparedness, and independence.

Mapping these archetypes across the broader population revealed an important imbalance: while expert travelers were the most self-sufficient, first-time and moderately experienced travelers made up the majority—and expressed the greatest need for support. This spectrum reframed the problem from designing for a single “solo traveler” to intentionally prioritizing those earlier in their journey.

Based on insights from 16 user interviews, patterns emerged around how women experience solo travel—not as fixed personas, but along a spectrum of confidence, preparedness, and independence.

Mapping these archetypes across the broader population revealed an important imbalance: while expert travelers were the most self-sufficient, first-time and moderately experienced travelers made up the majority—and expressed the greatest need for support. This spectrum reframed the problem from designing for a single “solo traveler” to intentionally prioritizing those earlier in their journey.

ideate

ideate

Experiment #1: Solving for Social Isolation

Experiment #1: Solving for Social Isolation

Hypothesis:

Hypothesis:

By facilitating meetups between solo female travelers, they will feel a greater sense of comfort in socializing during their trip and ultimately have a more fulfilling journey.

Connection is broken down into two components:


1. Interests Do we want to do the same things while traveling?
2. PersonalityDo we seem similar or in sync?

Instead of converging on one solution, I explored multiple ways to visualize each component and compared how they shaped perception, trust, and intent.

By facilitating meetups between solo female travelers, they will feel a greater sense of comfort in socializing during their trip and ultimately have a more fulfilling journey.

Connection could be meaningfully expressed through two complementary components:

1. InterestsDo we want to do the same things while traveling?
2. PersonalityDo they feel safe, relatable, and human?

Instead of converging on one solution, I explored multiple ways to visualize each component and compared how they shaped perception, trust, and intent.

Research question:

Research question:

How do solo female travelers decide who feels safe and worth meeting while traveling?

How do solo female travelers decide who feels safe and worth meeting while traveling?

Why these prototypes:

Why these prototypes:

I leveraged familiar mental models from dating apps and personality-assessment frameworks—tools this demographic already identifies with—to test how best to communicate the interests and personality of someone they had never met.

I leveraged familiar mental models from dating apps and personality-assessment frameworks—tools this demographic already identifies with—to test how best to communicate the interests and personality of someone they had never met.

A) Assessing Interests

A) Assessing Interests

B) Assessing Personality

B) Assessing Personality

Synthesis

Synthesis

Experiment #1:
Translating User Insights into Actionable Design Goals for Social Connection

Experiment #1:
Translating User Insights into Actionable Design Goals for Social Connection

USER TESTING INSIGHT 1

USER TESTING INSIGHT 1

For short-term socializing, shared interests matter more than personality.

For short-term socializing, shared interests matter more than personality.

design goal 1

design goal 1

Make interests instantly scannable for short-term meetups so users can decide quickly and confidently.

Make interests instantly scannable for short-term meetups so users can decide quickly and confidently.

USER TESTING INSIGHT 2

USER TESTING INSIGHT 2

Personality cues matter more than shared interests more for long-term trips.

Personality cues matter more than shared interests more for long-term trips.

Personality cues matter more than shared interests more for long-term trips.

design goal 2

design goal 2

Pair interest signals with personality cues so profiles communicate both what you’ll do together and who they are.

Pair interest signals with personality cues so profiles communicate both what you’ll do together and who they are.

USER TESTING INSIGHT 3

USER TESTING INSIGHT 3

For long-term travel, compatibility matters more than shared activities alone.

For long-term travel, compatibility matters more than shared activities alone.

design goal 3

design goal 3

Provide rich personality expression options for longer travel scenarios.

Provide rich personality expression options for longer travel scenarios.

USER TESTING INSIGHT 4

USER TESTING INSIGHT 4

Solo female travelers are goal-oriented.

Solo female travelers are goal-oriented.

design goal 4

design goal 4

Make travel intent and goals visible early in profiles.

Make travel intent and goals visible early in profiles.

ideate

ideate

Experiment #2: Solving for Safety

Experiment #2: Solving for Safety

For the second prototype, I attempted to tackle the issue of safety. The second screen shows “Safety points” which are designated locations to find solace. I also explored the idea of providing travelers “Safe paths”, as well as more wider locations of “Safe Zones.”

For the second prototype, I attempted to tackle the issue of safety. The second screen shows “Safety points” which are designated locations to find solace. I also explored the idea of providing travelers “Safe paths”, as well as more wider locations of “Safe Zones.”

Hypothesis:

Hypothesis:

Providing travelers with location-based safety cues in real time will increase confidence and reduce anxiety while navigating new environments.

By facilitating meetups between solo female travelers, they will feel a greater sense of comfort in socializing during their trip and ultimately have a more fulfilling journey.

Connection could be meaningfully expressed through two complementary components:

1. InterestsDo we want to do the same things while traveling?
2. PersonalityDo they feel safe, relatable, and human?

Instead of converging on one solution, I explored multiple ways to visualize each component and compared how they shaped perception, trust, and intent.

Research question:

Research question:

How might we support solo female travelers in navigating safety in the moment while traveling alone?

How might we support solo female travelers in navigating safety in the moment while traveling alone?

Why these prototypes:

Why these prototypes:

To reduce cognitive load in high-stress moments, I grounded these prototypes in familiar navigation and location mental models, layering in shared, community-driven safety context. Two prototypes focus on planning for safety in advance, while the latter two explore support in the moment, when context and speed matter most.

To reduce cognitive load in high-stress moments, I grounded these prototypes in familiar navigation and location mental models, layering in shared, community-driven safety context. Two prototypes focus on planning for safety in advance, while the latter two explore support in the moment, when context and speed matter most.

synthesis

synthesis

Experiment #2:
Translating User Insights into Actionable Design Goals for Safety

Experiment #2:
Translating User Insights into Actionable Design Goals for Safety

This prototype went over really poorly. I ran up against questions of data and tech viability issues, but worse than that, I was butting heads with some ethical design issues that could result in racial bias, harassment, and surveillance.

This prototype went over really poorly. I ran up against questions of data and tech viability issues, but worse than that, I was butting heads with some ethical design issues that could result in racial bias, harassment, and surveillance.

USER TESTING INSIGHT 1

USER TESTING INSIGHT 1

Safety is subjective—and products can’t promise it.

Safety features risk reinforcing fear, bias, and mistrust if they rely on surveillance or judgment.

Safety is subjective—and products can’t promise it.

Safety features risk reinforcing fear, bias, and mistrust if they rely on surveillance or judgment.

Safety is subjective—and products can’t promise it.

Safety features risk reinforcing fear, bias, and mistrust if they rely on surveillance or judgment.

design goal 4

design goal 4

Design for empowerment over enforcement: provide clear expectations, consent, and user control instead of “guarantees” or monitoring.

Design for empowerment over enforcement: provide clear expectations, consent, and user control instead of “guarantees” or monitoring.

Design for empowerment over enforcement: provide clear expectations, consent, and user control instead of “guarantees” or monitoring.

USER TESTING INSIGHT 2

USER TESTING INSIGHT 2

Real-time safety signals raise major questions around accuracy, data sources, and who maintains or verifies them at scale.

Real-time safety signals raise major questions around accuracy, data sources, and who maintains or verifies them at scale.

Real-time safety signals raise major questions around accuracy, data sources, and who maintains or verifies them at scale.

design goal 2

design goal 2

Ground safety in feasible, transparent systems: use lightweight, explainable safety supports that don’t depend on unverifiable real-time data.

Ground safety in feasible, transparent systems: use lightweight, explainable safety supports that don’t depend on unverifiable real-time data.

Ground safety in feasible, transparent systems: use lightweight, explainable safety supports that don’t depend on unverifiable real-time data.

design exploration

design exploration

Combining Experiments #1+2 to Flesh Out Information Architecture & Wireframing for Final Prototype

Information Architecture & Wireframing

synthesis

synthesis

User Testing the Final Prototype

User Testing the Final Prototype

The approach to testing was intentional with guidelines and questions intact; yet loose enough to garner unexpected feedback because it was not a task-oriented script.

The approach to testing was intentional with guidelines and questions intact; yet loose enough to garner unexpected feedback because it was not a task-oriented script.

Home Page

Home Page

What was tested

What was tested

What was tested

  1. First-time users’ ability to understand the purpose, priority, and relevance of the information presented

  2. Alignment between displayed content and user expectations

  3. Which elements felt urgent, contextual, or confusing at a glance

  1. First-time users’ ability to understand the purpose, priority, and relevance of the information presented

  2. Alignment between displayed content and user expectations

  3. Which elements felt urgent, contextual, or confusing at a glance

Meet Sisters Page

Meet Sisters Page

What was tested

What was tested

What was tested

  1. Whether UI elements accurately depict information about another user

  2. Understanding the key concepts of traveler vs. local

  3. Clarity and usefulness of the “Open to meet” toggle

  4. How users expected filtering and sorting to work when discovering other sisters

Filter Sisters Page

Filter Sisters Page

What was tested

What was tested

What was tested

  1. How users expected to filter Sisters when opening the filter menu

  2. Whether filter categories (age, trip interests, personality) felt relevant and intuitive

  3. Whether the filter experience felt helpful or overwhelming when refining results

User Profiles

User Profiles

What was tested

What was tested

What was tested

  1. Whether profile information clearly communicated who someone is and why you might want to meet them

  2. Understanding of key distinctions, including traveler vs. local and profile iconography

  3. How users interpreted safety and comfort cues when evaluating another person

  4. Clarity and usefulness of interests, goals, and shared attributes

  5. Whether any information felt unnecessary, overwhelming, or distracting

  1. Whether profile information clearly communicated who someone is and why you might want to meet them

  2. Understanding of key distinctions, including traveler vs. local and profile iconography

  3. How users interpreted safety and comfort cues when evaluating another person

  4. Clarity and usefulness of interests, goals, and shared attributes

  5. Whether any information felt unnecessary, overwhelming, or distracting

Final designs

Final designs

Visual Identity

Visual Identity

The finished visual identity was made to feel magical, yet approachable.

The finished visual identity was made to feel magical, yet approachable.

Want to chat? Me too!

Let's connect :) Let's chat :)

hsoletic@gmail.com

Text me when you get back to your home page safely!!

©2026 Hillary Soletic

Want to chat? Me too!

Let's connect :) Let's chat :)

hsoletic@gmail.com

Text me when you get back to your home page safely!!

©2026 Hillary Soletic

Want to chat? Me too!

Let's connect :) Let's chat :)

hsoletic@gmail.com

Text me when you get back to your home page safely!!

©2026 Hillary Soletic